Enterprise portals
Many roles, many modules, compliance. Vue would work too - structure is the win here.
Frontend - Angular
Structured UIs for teams that stay with the same product for years - modules, standards, no "everyone brings their own framework".
Large interfaces, several teams, a long lifespan.
Many roles, many modules, compliance. Vue would work too - structure is the win here.
Old version, nobody dares to upgrade. We raise it step by step.
Without conventions every feature turns into a dialect. We set the guard rails.
Streams, polling, offline edges. RxJS with discipline, not as a sport.
Architecture that survives reviews.
Lazy routes, clear APIs between features, shared code only where sharing is honest.
Major versions in steps, tests on the critical flows.
Internal library, tokens, consistent forms.
REST/BFF, auth, interceptors, error and empty states.
Angular pays off when the team uses the rails. We write the rails down - and stick to them ourselves.
Pattern first, then breadth.
Version, bundle, the three painful modules.
One feature built to the target architecture.
Further modules or upgrade steps.
Docs, lint, CI, pairing with your team.
Built to last - not "rewrite in two years".
We plan major versions instead of fearing them.
Pairing and reviews, so the knowledge does not stay with us.
If Vue is enough, we recommend Vue.
Internal control frontend: roles, approvals, audit log. Angular upgrade plus module boundaries. Goal: shorter feature cycles, manageable bundles.
Structural questions, answered briefly.
A steeper start, a clear win on large UIs. For landing pages it is the wrong tool.
As much state library as the case needs. Not every list is a global store.
When there are several apps and libraries. Otherwise the standard CLI.
Yes, step by step, with tests on the expensive routes.
We do, or your team. Contracts first.
An audit plus a sample module. Fixed scope.
Related technologies we often use alongside.
Version, team size, pain points - we suggest an audit or a feature slice.